FlipBoard

Welcome to our new Magazine format! All new content will now be brought to you in this easy, new format. All our older content can still be found by scrolling below. Simply click the ">" to start the magazine and navigate via your arrow keys.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Primitive Fire piston Making

For those that wish to make a fire piston the way aboriginal ppl did then these are for you my kindred brothers :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NKq4...e=channel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK2yq...eature=channel

Abandoning A BOL in City Limits, Do You Still Have Cache Options?

This post may belong somewhere else, not sure. If it's not where it need be, mods please relocate at your convenience with my apologies.

When bugging out there are many situations that may render it necessary to abandon your vehicle. That being the case, I've always been a proponent of having extra supplies within the vehicle to cache close by the area you've felt compelled to abandon. The logic behind this being that there is enough space inside a vehicle (mine anyway) for supplies over and above what you can travel with on foot, so having an emergency cache in a location close to your vehicle is appealing if only to prevent the extras from becoming completely useless. Sure you can't carry the excess far, but perhaps just far enough to cache it as a "just in case" rally point for later on.

Plenty of reasons for this IMO. It could be you find it necessary for a quick retreat after misjudging an outlet route; it could be that the walking path you chose has been compromised by checkpoints or bad-folks-a-plenty. Could be you've been turned around after a few days due to newly discovered environmental changes and need to re-up ammo, food or water, I mean the list could go on. Basically it just makes good sense to me.

I'm just wondering if y'all have any views on caching should you have to abandon the vehicle in an urban area? Close enough to a wooded area you're almost golden as long as you've got brain cells and time to recon. A shovel and motivation and you can usually find somewhere to bury things that will have a good chance of remaining undiscovered for a few days, weeks even. However, burying stuff in cities will be next to impossible, and just by having caches close to a moving population you run a risk of it being discovered.

So, with burying out of the question, there has to still be some options for hiding and concealing an emergency resupply in that situation, yes? Maybe a concealment device you could bring along in the BOV as a cover or subterfuge? What kind of contraption I have no idea, but there has to be something. Ideas?

Just off the top of my head I'm thinking that some warning labels/stickers might come in handy to discourage any close examination. Signs like "Biological Hazard", "Unexploded Ordinance", "Rabies Quarantine", "Beware: Justin Bieber Music" (lol), maybe some police tape, e.t.c... might work I guess - if you can find a suitable hide spot to stick them on. Maybe even body bags, as morbid as that might be? Rigging a bang as a preventative measure is not a possibility to me, since I wouldn't want to hurt someone inadvertently, and God forbid a child should happen on it by mistake. Not to mention explosions and body parts laying around a stash could cause more attention, which kinda defeats the purpose.

Just thinking out loud really, but considering I'm stuck in a city for the next while, I do wonder if there any proven way or any methods y'all would follow to construct or conceal a quick emergency cache in a city area, leaving a good chance of it remaining intact for a reasonable amount of time anyway?

Have a Good Radio in Your Survival Supplies During a Disaster

The BBC is broadcasting life-saving information to the hundreds of thousands of people affected by the monumental flooding in Pakistan. So many are cut off from emergency aid efforts. They’re issuing bulletins in the languages spoken most there on staying safe, avoiding disease, and how to get food and other help. It’s not uncommon for this to be done by the BBC and other international broadcasters, including Christian ministries like Trans World Radio. Most international broadcasters have cut back on shortwave transmissions in favor of partnering with local AM and FM outlets who receive designated programming by satellite and Internet.
Though the Internet is growing world wide, many in lesser developed countries still rely heavily on radio for information. Local and international broadcasters provide a useful and valuable service that can literally save lives.
When there’s a major natural disaster here in the U.S., where do most of us get our information? Though many turn to the Internet with computers or smart phones, plenty of us still turn to local radio. AM and FM broadcasts may be the only option when the power’s out.
A key advantage to listening to radio is you don’t have to be connected to the Internet. No wireless connection required. The only thing you need is good batteries or another source of power, such as a wind-up generator or solar power. Radios have gotten better at stretching battery life, too.
We often turn to radio in severe weather. But think back a few years to a bigger event–Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Radio stations in New Orleans combined efforts and personnel to provide useful information to their listeners.
People who still had phone service of some kind could call into the stations to report what was happening in their neighborhoods. For me the listener, this was fascinating.
I was able to listen in because, like many, I can hear WWL radio, New Orleans, at night from hundreds of miles away. In fact, WHRI, a U.S. shortwave station, broadcasted WWL to an even larger audience.
When the big earthquake struck San Francisco in 1989, I heard the rebroadcast of one of San Francisco’s stations on WLS, Chicago. Again, for me it made for fascinating listening.
In 1999 during the pre-Y2K jitters, one expert made a list of skywave radio stations available on his Web site. He believed it was important to be able to listen to those stations which could be heard over great distances at night.
You may have your own examples of how standard broadcast radio has been helpful to you in a time of disaster. If so, you already know how important it is to have a simple AM/FM radio in your survival supplies.
Many companies offer small portable radios as part of their ready-made survival kits. Some radios are combined with flashlights. Without trying out such radios ahead of time, it’s hard to say whether they’ll meet your needs adequately during or after a disaster.
I recommend getting a good radio. It may be necessary to monitor stations at a distance if local stations are knocked off the air. Cheaper radios may not pick up distant stations well.
The CC Observer or the Kaito WRX911 both have excellent AM reception. The Observer has weather band coverage and a LED flashlight. The Kaito is a pocket radio with shortwave coverage. Both are simple to operate, which is a plus in stressful situations. Neither are expensive when you consider what each does.
Unless we have a giant EMP (electromagnetic pulse) one day which takes out all things electronic, you can’t beat an AM/FM radio as an information source when disaster strikes. Make sure you have one or two among your survival supplies. I wouldn’t be without mine.